Dear Classical Wisdom Reader,

It really made me groan.

Just a couple of months ago, I was at one of my local bookshops during the sales of the early new year, when they attempt to clear the unsold Christmas stock.

One of the books available was Bono’s recently released autobiography, entitled ‘Surrender’. Now Bono remains something of a controversial figure here in Ireland, but I’ve enjoyed enough of his music over the years that I was intrigued to check it out.

I had a flick through it and I thought it seemed OK, but… The blurb on the back referred to it as “Not a memoir, but a WE-moir,” which I thought was so corny, I just had to put it back down.

(Although maybe I shouldn’t be judging a book by its back cover!)

Now strange as it sounds, the annual deluge of celebrity autobiographies actually has its origins in the ancient world.

Autobiographies, at least in the Western tradition, are generally thought to begin with St. Augustine’s Confessions (although there’s a couple of other contenders for the title, as we shall see), but biographies stretch back even further.

Today’s article takes a look at these early chronicles of people’s lives, the blurred line between ‘biographies’ and ‘autobiographies’, and how this evolving new genre had deep political implications… plus how the perennially popular Meditations of Marcus Aurelius fits into all this.

Just don’t get Bono involved!

All the best,

Sean Kelly

Managing Editor

Classical Wisdom

P.S. If you’re interested in the life and writings of Marcus Aurelius, be sure to check out Plato Academy Centre’s online Marcus Aurelius Anniversary Event, marking the emperor-philosopher’s birthday on April 26th at 3PM EST. You can register for that HERE.

Featuring experts in Stoicism Donald Robertson and Stephen O. Williams, it’s an event you won’t want to miss! You can register for that HERE.

P.P.S. We’re having our own event on the same day, looking at Ayn Rand and Stoicism. That’s on April 26th at 1PM EST. You can find out more about that HERE.

On to ancient biographies!

The First Biographers

By Ben Potter

What springs to mind when we think about literature of the ancient world? Maybe it’s Homer’s Achilles dragging the corpse of Hector around Troy or Sophocles’ Oedipus stabbing out his polluted eyes. Perhaps it’s Plato’s Socrates holding forth or Herodotus’ Leonidas and his 300 Spartans. It even might be the dulcet tones of Sappho, the penetrating poems of Catullus, or the scathing superiority of Cicero.

Whilst the above mentioned epic poetry, theatrical drama, philosophical dialogue, historiography, romantic poetry, and private correspondence are all represented as well as appreciated, we give less thought to an area of literature that has never been more prevalent than it is in modern times.

It is the form of writing which is the savior for those wishing to buy lousy, last-minute Christmas presents; the biography.

The beginnings of this genre are both fragmentary and fractured, as the writers of biography have their smudgy thumbprints all across the literature of antiquity. Consequently, it is difficult to pinpoint exactly when ‘biography’ begins.

Fantastical as it may be, a case can be made for Homer’s Odyssey being an early antecedent. A more palatable comparison, however, can be found in early Greek dirges and funeral orations.

Likewise, the first historians, Herodotus and Thucydides, comprised elements of biography within their works, but these were (as in histories today) used for example, explanation and color. Essentially as a means, not an end.

Thucydides does get mightily close with his almost fanatical devotion to the famous 5th century Athenian statesman, Pericles; likewise with his depictions of Themistocles and Pausanias – two of the leading lights of the Persian Wars.

Thucydides’ contemporary Xenophon is sometimes credited with siring the genre. However, his Cyropaedia (life of Cyrus the Great) is more akin to Plato’s Republic or Polybius’ Book VI in that it has an agenda in promoting and justifying a specific form of government or political system.

Not surprisingly, it took the interference of Aristotle to change the way biography was approached.

His views on ethics prompted the rethink that deeds were no longer the be-all and end-all of a man’s life; his character was now worth more than a mere footnote.

The reign of Alexander the Great, brief as it was (336-323 BC), was the next great catalyst which brought a spate of biographical works. Notably from Ptolemy I, the founder of the dynasty that would eventually (and incestuously) spawn Cleopatra.

Some biographers, such as Onesicritus, dealt with how Alexander was brought up, rather that his personality or accomplishments. Ptolemy, however, focused on Alexander, the man, more than his exploits. Furthermore, Ptolemy contributed to the field of biography beyond his scribblings. He also created an ethos of scholasticism, most notably by establishing the Royal Library of Alexandria.

Then there was the memoir, the most self-indulgent and vainglorious form of biography, which was also in existence (even if not prevalent) in the Greek world.

When Romans came to dominate the Mediterranean both artistically as well as militaristically, the biography became exultant and, very often, ‘auto’.

This is thought to have been due to the importance of family, specifically of the reflected glory of noble lineage – a preoccupation that went far beyond familial pride. A Roman’s self-worth was intrinsically linked to the glory of his forbears, a concept that never failed to irk the novus homo, Cicero.

The fact that Romans paraded busts of prominent ancestors at funerals shows how much stock they put in…. well, stock.

Indeed, the death of a family member was a wonderful opportunity to pompously self-promote. It could even be said that the distastefully elaborate and lengthy epitaphs from the time were a form of biography in themselves.

In general, biography became an exercise not only in curiosity or narcissism, but also in duty and career advancement.

For example, Julius Caesar’s Commentarii de Bello Civili and Commentarii de Bello Gallico (chronicling his part in the Civil and Gallic wars respectively) best capture the imagination. Not merely because they were particularly subtle and sly in terms of self-glorification, but because they worked in advancing his political position – or at the very least, appear to have done. Well… until he was stabbed anyway!

However, the precedent had been set, a tradition had begun. The emperors Augustus, Tiberius, Hadrian and Septimius Severus all wrote similar such books.

Marcus Aurelius, the great philosophical emperor, reached a zenith in this narrow field with his intellectually curious and stoic form of self-promotion. Indeed, it is thought there is nothing comparable to his introspection written by a native Latin.

It’s important to remember that in general, the biography was not merely a vehicle for glory, but for survival of both oneself and one’s state.

As the Republic was dying and the Empire forming, power seemed to be capriciously ebbing out of the hands of all those who briefly held it. With the stakes so unprecedentedly high, biography was used to defend, accuse, counter-accuse… it became the conduit, the desperate measure the desperate times required.

————————————-

P.S. The Other Biographers

You may be amazed that the above article could have discussed ancient biography without even alluding to the contributions of men like Theopompus, Timaeus, Plutarch, Josephus, Tacitus, Sulla and Sallust.

The truth is that each of these fine exemplars of the art could easily have devoured the author’s weekly word-count without so much as a “how do you do”.

That said, the one glaring omission who deserves special attention (even in the context of why he has been ignored) is Suetonius.

His Da vita Caesarum, commonly known as The Twelve Caesars, is a masterpiece in the field of ancient biography.

Dealing with the lives of the leaders of Rome from Julius Caesar up to Domition, it is a work truly worthy of scrutiny. Indeed, it could be said (though I’m sure not entirely without detractors) that, when it comes to the biography of antiquity, Suetonius is even more essential than he is elegant and enlightening.

Rather than use my own paltry words, I will borrow from the foremost expert in the field, Christopher Pelling of Christ Church College, Oxford. Here he explains the impact and importance that Suetonius had in highlighting the un-oscillating swing that had occurred in the higher echelons of Roman politics:

“The style of the Caesars proved congenial as spectators increasingly saw Roman history in terms of the ruling personality, and biography supplanted historiography as the dominant mode of record”.

And this style, twinned with the introspection and inquisitiveness of Marcus Aurelius, are the ingredients that go into many of the biographies flying off the shelves today.